toot.wales is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
We are the Open Social network for Wales and the Welsh, at home and abroad! Y rhwydwaith cymdeithasol annibynnol i Gymru, wedi'i bweru gan Mastodon!

Administered by:

Server stats:

656
active users

#dwp

1 post1 participant0 posts today

Disability groups say no vote on disability cuts until Wales has full consultation

The open letter has been signed by dozens of politicians, campaign groups and individuals after Wales’ only face-to-face consultation event due to take place in Cardiff on 3 June was cancelled at the last minute.

The letter from campaign group Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) Cymru is addressed to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Welsh Government First Minister Eluned Morgan, Rachel Reeves, Liz Kendall, Stephen Timms, Alison McGovern and Jo Stevens and says: “The government are running a consultation on disability cuts called the “Pathways to Work: Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper”.

“The DWP have cancelled the only in-person consultation event for the whole of Wales, and do not plan to run another.

“They did this after announcing an inaccessible venue at the last minute, in what we believe to be a clear example of disability discrimination.

“The consultation was always going to be unfair, given half the proposals – the most important half – were off the table for discussion on day one.

“There must be no vote in the House of Commons on disability cuts until a full and genuine public consultation has been carried out in Wales.

“Given the government’s complete failure to listen to disabled people, and the DWP’s demonstrated inability to arrange a genuine consultation, any consultation must be run independently by Welsh disabled people’s organisations, also inviting the views of carers. The DWP must attend as observers.”

Senedd Member, Sioned Williams MS joined DPAC Cymru at a protest in Cardiff on 3 June – the date of the cancelled consultation.

Sioned Williams at the Cardiff protest(Image: Swansea DPAC)

Ms Williams, who is Plaid Cymru’s spokesperson on Social Justice and Equalities, said: “With 190,000 – a staggering 6% of the people of Wales – set to lose out, Welsh communities will be the hardest hit by Labour’s cruel disability cuts, yet the Labour UK Government refuse to even hold a consultation event in Wales. If anybody needed further proof of Labour’s contempt towards Wales, here it is.

“While the Labour UK Government treats Wales as an unimportant consequence to their decisions, Labour in Wales simply watch on in disinterest, instead of calling out the UK Government’s austerity-driven agenda. Labour has no interest in doing what is right for our communities, only what is deemed suitable in their attempt to reverse their plummeting polling numbers.

“Welsh communities deserve a government that will put them first, they deserve a government that puts Wales and Welsh communities first. Labour have shown that their priorities lie with their party, not with our country. That is why Wales needs a Plaid Cymru Government in 2026 that will always fight for what is fair to Wales.”

Swansea Bay News asked the Department for Work and Pensions for their response to DPAC Cymru’s letter and to confirm if a consultation will be held in Wales.

UK Government Minister for Social Security and Disability, Sir Stephen Timms responded: “It is crucial that the views and voices of sick or disabled people across Wales are at the heart of our reforms, which is why we’ve rescheduled a consultation event in Cardiff after it was cancelled by the venue.

“Having listened to people’s calls for more consultation opportunities in Wales we have also arranged an additional virtual event, so even more people can take part.

“We will continue to look at the specific impacts for those living in Wales as we seek to support people back into work if they are able, while also protecting those who rely on our social security system.”

Swansea Bay News has asked the DWP for the details of the rescheduled Cardiff consultation, but the department has yet to confirm the date.

Continued thread

"No court order is needed for such en masse surveillance. The affected individuals won’t be told. There is no right of appeal. The information that DWP will demand has not yet been explained. The government has promised a code of practice but that has not yet been published i.e. the law has been passed by the Commons without knowing the full details."

#DWP#LiNO#Benefits
Continued thread

"Banks will be required to develop algorithms to search and report information demanded by DWP. The cost of developing algorithms is to be borne by banks and will ultimately be passed to bank customers. Inevitably, banks are not keen on the new duties, especially as it makes them a de facto arm of the repressive state and conflicts with their duty of confidentiality."

#DWP#LiNO#Benefits

"PAFER assumes that recipients of benefits have criminal tendencies and must therefore be denied financial privacy. It empowers the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) to compel banks and financial institutions to scrutinise accounts of benefit claimants and provide specified information to help it verify eligibility of claimants of benefits."

#DWP #LiNO #Benefits #Surveillance

leftfootforward.org/2025/05/a-

Left Foot Forward: Leading the UK's progressive debate · A new bill will lead to mass state surveillance for the most vulnerable. We must act.This bill grants the government powers of surveillance on the bank accounts of the poor, old, sick and disabled people receiving specified benefits
Continued thread

Caring is a gendered issue. 60% of unpaid carers are women.

‘Unpaid carers in England and Wales contribute £445 million to the economy every day, adding up to £162 billion per year’

carersfirst.org.uk/news-and-st

‘Among carers in employment, 58% are women and 42% men.’

But what was the gender breakdown of senior decision makers and IT implementation of solutions to track wages of carers at #DWP?

Continued thread

‘The benefit is paid to about 1 million unpaid carers – people who carry out the arduous and demanding task of providing round-the-clock care for frail, sick or disabled loved ones. It is the UK’s lowest-value benefit, worth £83.30 a week.

Those who claim it are allowed to work part-time but there is a strict limit on how much they can earn: if they earn a single penny over that limit – £196 a week – their entire benefit is considered to be an overpayment, a debt that is then owed to the #DWP.’

‘The carer’s allowance scandal – because of which 144,000 carers are repaying more than £251m – continues to claim victims and will do so for the immediate future as the DWP works its way through thousands of backlogged overpayments.’

“In any sort of ethical world, this would not happen.”

The #DWP ignored whistleblowers and continued to fine and prosecute #carers.

theguardian.com/news/ng-intera

The Guardian · ‘Something has gone very wrong’: how the carers scandal was exposedBy Patrick Butler

So as if being registered severely sight impaired, being in a life changing poly traumatic incident, having a heart attack and being diagnosed with CFS/ME wasn’t enough, Mrs K now has to have a phone interview with a UC health ‘professional’. Ffs #DWP #UC #PIP #Disability

Been helping a friend through a Pip claim.

Applied:
2 weeks for forms to come.
3 months for claim to be approved.

Applied for a mandatory reconsideration over the phone:
4 weeks for text message informing it has been received and that the reconsideration will be looked at in the next 3 months.

I'm convinced it's this convoluted by design to make people give up on their claim.

#pip#disability#dwp

This is grim 😒

Listening to Page 94: The Private Eye Podcast (141: Day 2: The Carer's Allowance Scandal): audioboom.com/posts/8718915

Patrick Butler and Josh Halliday (The Guardian) uncovered how vulnerable British carers were taken to court for accidentally claiming carer’s allowance while working part-time – even though many had tried to report their earnings to the Department of Work and Pensions.